diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/HPPavilion_15_CS_Repair.pdf b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/HPPavilion_15_CS_Repair.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b666bc5 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/HPPavilion_15_CS_Repair.pdf differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/docs/1.tex b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/docs/1.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..47cfe61 --- /dev/null +++ b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/docs/1.tex @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + +\documentclass[11pt]{article} +%Gummi|065|=) +\usepackage{graphicx} +\usepackage{caption} +\title{\textbf{HP Pavilion 15 Repair}} +\author{Steak Electronics} +\date{} +\begin{document} + +\maketitle + +\section{Overview} + +User spilled tonic water on a laptop, then kept it powered on and continued to use it (this was a mistake. Turning it off, and removing battery / power, letting the liquid dry, is always the first step in a spill). The next morning the laptop would not power on. +\section{Equipment} +Laptop is an HP Pavilion 15 CS model. They are fairly new (date codes on micros are from 2018), and retailing around 500-600 dollars as of just before 2019. +\includegraphics[scale=0.2]{../pics/DSCN1016.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{HP} +\section{Disassembly} +There is no video tutorial on this online, but the steps are: Remove visible screws from the back of the case. Remove rubber feet, and screws beneath them. Pry open case from edges with plastic spudger tool to remove the clips. You must be careful, as the clips and case are fragile. +\begin{itemize} +\item Where to start with the spudger, and also showing the screwholes underneath the rubber feet. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.2]{../pics/DSCN1019.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Disassembly} +\item I was able to scratch the case with the plastic spudger. Be careful! + +\includegraphics[scale=0.2]{../pics/DSCN1021.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Disassembly} +\item The case can also crack from pulling it. I didn't pull this hard, but the brittle weak case cracked slightly. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{../pics/DSCN1022.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Disassembly} +\item Finally we are in. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{../pics/DSCN1023.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Disassembly} +\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{../pics/DSCN1024.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Disassembly} +\item Screws are labeled, to help illustrate what size each is: + +\includegraphics[scale=0.2]{../pics/DSCN1026.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Disassembly} + +\end{itemize} + + + + + +\section{Diagnosis and Repair Log} +Now we will try to find out what is wrong. +\begin{itemize} +\item Right away I can see some visible marring from a likely shorted component. This is where a lot of the soda residue is. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{../pics/DSCN1029.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Repair} + +\item You can see a layer of cellophane that is in place to protect against spills. Amazing how millions of man hours can go into designing computers, yet a single glass of liquid can destroy one. Something is wrong, here. Crazy. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.2]{../pics/DSCN1034.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Repair} + +\item This switcher, the BACAAB (?) chip is the one that has the failed components. I need a replacement but can't find a data sheet on it. I tried probing at some of the pins to see what was going on, and if I could understand a bit more about this, but due to me probing too close to the pins, (and a few factors, primarily the small package, but no leads, and also the fact I should've used the pads NEAR but not ON the package, I shorted something, and a spark resulted. While I saw a 2.4V signal on a pin, after the short, I was unable to find anything. The battery being removed and replaced did not bring it back. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{../pics/DSCN1036.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Repair} + +\item At this point, this chip, which I am unsure of what it is, appears to have a short and is overheating / shorting. I will need to get a motherboard donor at this point, to further repair the mistakes. As these are new boards, motherboards are not yet cheap enough to make this viable, so I will wait and try again at a later date. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{../pics/DSCN1037.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Repair} + +\item During my troubleshooting, I did find an open resistor, and a capacitor that has visible charring on its solder joint. I'll need to replace these as well. I should've replaced this at first, but without a schematic, I don't know what value the cap should be. The resistor is labeled as 1R0, but reads open. There may also be one other cap that has failed. However, some other components appear OK. + +\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{../pics/DSCN1039.JPG} +\captionof{figure}{Site of failed components from soda water spill.} + +\end{itemize} + + + + +\end{document} diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1016.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1016.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..13a9daa Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1016.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1017.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1017.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..495ac77 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1017.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1018.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1018.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..83ed7e7 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1018.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1019.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1019.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d60dc3c Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1019.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1020.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1020.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc22b86 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1020.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1021.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1021.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c96576f Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1021.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1022.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1022.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6c9476d Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1022.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1023.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1023.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..71a6bd2 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1023.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1024.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1024.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cc4264 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1024.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1025.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1025.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e4e3e44 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1025.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1026.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1026.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9748de0 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1026.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1027.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1027.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..287bc55 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1027.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1029.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1029.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1610342 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1029.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1030.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1030.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4990d98 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1030.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1031.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1031.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f08beb1 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1031.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1032.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1032.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4000029 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1032.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1033.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1033.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7976efa Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1033.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1034.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1034.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9a43d18 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1034.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1036.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1036.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..574a61a Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1036.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1037.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1037.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..01f0f33 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1037.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1038.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1038.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..19d3705 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1038.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1039.JPG b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1039.JPG new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fac745 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/pics/DSCN1039.JPG differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/A01-RTL8111EVL-F(RTL8111E-VL-CG_Datasheet_1 1.pdf b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/A01-RTL8111EVL-F(RTL8111E-VL-CG_Datasheet_1 1.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..84e63f1 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/A01-RTL8111EVL-F(RTL8111E-VL-CG_Datasheet_1 1.pdf differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/APW8868B.pdf b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/APW8868B.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8bf7b19 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/APW8868B.pdf differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/DPS1113.pdf b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/DPS1113.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c637bb Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/DPS1113.pdf differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/rtl8111c_datasheet_1.1.pdf b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/rtl8111c_datasheet_1.1.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..696a809 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/rtl8111c_datasheet_1.1.pdf differ diff --git a/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/spec-8111b(140).pdf b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/spec-8111b(140).pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e7cefe9 Binary files /dev/null and b/HP_Pavilion_15_cs0053/resources/spec-8111b(140).pdf differ diff --git a/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/docs/1791c-b1_10.odt b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/docs/1791c-b1_10.odt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd36de2 Binary files /dev/null and b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/docs/1791c-b1_10.odt differ diff --git a/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/docs/1791c-b1_11.odt b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/docs/1791c-b1_11.odt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1c6c81 Binary files /dev/null and b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/docs/1791c-b1_11.odt differ diff --git a/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/resources/98.php b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/resources/98.php new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0ed4f94 --- /dev/null +++ b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/resources/98.php @@ -0,0 +1,811 @@ + + + + + + + Which MOSFET topology? - Jason Sachs + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
+
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
+ +

Which MOSFET topology?

Jason SachsSeptember 1, 20119 comments +

A recent electronics.StackExchange question brings up a good topic for discussion. Let's say you have a power supply and a 2-wire load you want to be able to switch on and off from the power supply using a MOSFET. How do you choose which circuit topology to choose? You basically have four options, shown below:

+

+

From left to right, these are:

+
    +
  1. High-side switch, N-channel MOSFET
  2. +
  3. High-side switch, P-channel MOSFET
  4. +
  5. Low-side switch, N-channel MOSFET
  6. +
  7. Low-side switch, P-channel MOSFET
  8. +
+

Basically you can use an N-channel MOSFET or a P-channel MOSFET, and put the switch above the load or vice-versa.

+

A quick reminder about using MOSFETs: A MOSFET has 3 terminals, gate, drain, and source. I've illustrated drain and source with D and S, respectively; the other terminal is the gate. The MOSFET is controlled by the relative voltage Vgs between its gate terminal and its source terminal.

+

If Vgs = 0, the MOSFET is off and conducts essentially no current between its drain and source terminals (although there is parasitic leakage, usually specified as a maximum of 1-100uA). For an N-channel MOSFET, the current that flows between drain and source increases rapidly as Vgs increases above its gate-to-source threshold voltage Vgs(th); at some point the current that conducts is determined by the load resistance rather than the MOSFET, in which case the MOSFET behaves like a resistor between drain and source. The resistance depends on Vgs as well, and is specified in the data sheet for particular Vgs levels. Most MOSFETs are specified at either Vgs = 10V (for "regular" MOSFETS) or Vgs = 4.5V (for "logic-level" MOSFETS, so-called because they can be driven by a 5V logic power supply), although nowadays there are an increasing number of low-voltage MOSFETS that have resistance specified at 3.3, 2.5, or even 1.8Vgs.

+

The voltage between drain and source on an N-channel MOSFET must be positive, otherwise a parasitic body diode between drain and source conducts to keep the drain from being more than a voltage drop below the source.

+

There are other important parameters of MOSFETs that you need to be know about (parasitic gate-drain and gate-source capacitance), but let's forget those for now.

+

(A quick recap: Vgs determines the current that can potentially flow from drain to source. If that current can't flow because the load resistance is too high, then the MOSFET acts like a resistor rather than a current sink. There's a body diode that conducts if the drain is pulled below the source terminal)

+

For P-channel MOSFETs, the polarity is reversed. The source terminal is normally more positive than the drain, and the MOSFET is turned on by negative Vgs.

+

So back to our four topologies. The most common configurations are probably in this order:

+

  3. Low-side switch, N-channel MOSFET (easiest/cheapest)
  2. High-side switch, P-channel MOSFET
  1. High-side switch, N-channel MOSFET
  4. Low-side switch, P-channel MOSFET (you essentially never see this)

+

Why?

+

Well, let's think about it. MOSFETs are controlled by their gate voltage relative to the source terminal. Of the four topologies, the only one that is relative to circuit ground is the low-side N-channel switch. Driving this circuit is a piece of cake. You generate a voltage source of 0 volts to turn the MOSFET off, and 5 or 10V above ground to turn the MOSFET on. (See my earlier blog post, Byte and Switch, for some minor gotchas.)

+

To understand why you would use either topology #2 (high-side P-channel) or #1 (high-side N-channel), there are two very important things to consider:

+

Circuit ground

+

The word "ground" is often misused in electronics. What it's supposed to mean is a low-resistance connection to a reference voltage. If you have appliances at home with a metal chassis and a 3-prong plug, the chassis is connected to the 3rd prong, and when you plug it into the AC mains, it's connected to a metal post in your home that is sunk into the earth. (In a car, there's not a good conductive path to the earth, but the metal frame of the car is "ground"; in this and other applications that do not have a protective earth connection, the word "ground" is misleading and "return" is a better term.) This is done for two reasons: safety and electromagnetic interference (EMI).

+

The safety aspect is that the earth's ground potential is generally -- except in weird lightning storms -- a safe voltage, so you can touch a grounded metal chassis with your hand and stand on a floor and not worry about being electrocuted. Whereas if you stand on a floor and you touch an exposed piece of metal that is significantly different from earth ground, you are likely to get hurt. Different standards apply but the generally accepted threshold is in the 50-60V range.

+

The EMI aspect is that ground is a stable voltage potential, and if an appliance is packaged in a conductive chassis, the chassis acts as a shield to block both outgoing and incoming electromagnetic radiation. If you attach the chassis to another potential that wiggles up and down relative to ground, it acts as an antenna, and can both emit and receive unwanted electromagnetic radiation.

+

For both these reasons, there are many types of two-terminal electrical loads (pumps, fans, motors, heaters, etc.) where it works very well to connect one of the two terminals to circuit ground. If this is the case, we are forced to use a high-side switch, which rules out topologies #3 and #4.

+

Otherwise, there is almost no reason not to use the low-side N-channel MOSFET.

+

N-channel and P-channel MOSFETs are not created equal

+

The general rule of thumb is that for the same price or for a given die area (and price is proportional to the amount of silicon used, so these are well-correlated), you will get worse performance in a P-channel MOSFET than in an N-channel MOSFET. (The charge mobility in N-channel devices is better than P-channel devices; if you want to know more, you should ask someone else who knows more than I do about device physics.) On-resistance is a lot higher in P-channel MOSFETS. Furthermore, manufacturers generally offer more choices in N-channel devices, especially at voltages above 100V.

+

So, all other things being equal, you should use an N-channel MOSFET, because you have more device choices and higher performance for a given device cost.

+ +

So to recap: some applications require high-side switches because one terminal of the load needs to be tied to ground for safety/EMI reasons. And N-channel MOSFETs are cheaper than P-channel MOSFETs for the same performance specs. Got it?

+

If you need to use a high-side switch, you have a tradeoff to make: do you want the cheaper switch, or do you want the cheaper gate drive?

+

If you pick topology #1 (high-side N-channel MOSFET), the gate drive circuitry is a little tricky. You need to control Vgs, but the source voltage will get yanked up and down as the switch turns on and off, and when it's on, the gate voltage has to be 5-10V above the supply voltage Vcc. You either need an isolated power supply, or what's called a bootstrap power supply where the switch turning on/off runs a charge pump to transfer charge to a capacitor that rides up and down with the MOSFET source terminal. There are many integrated circuit high-side MOSFET drivers available, and if you're switching on and off rapidly (pulse-width modulation), this can work quite well.

+

If you pick topology #2 (high-side P-channel MOSFET), the gate drive circuitry is a little easier. To turn the MOSFET off, tie the gate to the supply voltage Vcc. To turn the MOSFET on, pull the gate 5-10V below the supply voltage Vcc. This is still harder to control than the low-side N-channel MOSFET, but it can be done. If the supply voltage is in the 5-15V range, then you can generally find a P-channel MOSFET so that you can just connect the gate voltage to either Vcc (MOSFET off) or circuit ground (MOSFET on).

+

The last topology, #4 (low-side P-channel MOSFET), uses the lower performance P-channel device and requires a tricky gate drive to be relative to the MOSFET source which varies as the switch turns on and off. You will essentially never see this used in practice -- there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use a low-side N-channel MOSFET instead to get the cost and complexity down.

+

So if the load doesn't need to be grounded, topology #3 (low-side N-channel) is the clear winner.

+

Finally, a reminder that we've skipped over an important detail that is missing from all 4 topologies shown. All loads, even a short length of wire, have some amount of inductance. A so-called "resistive" load like a heating element with a few feet of cable can still have a few microhenries of inductance. If you turn off the MOSFET, and you do not provide a path for the inductive current to flow, it will find its own path, by generating enough voltage to bring the MOSFET into breakdown conduction, and dissipate this energy in the MOSFET. Unless the inductance is small, you should use a freewheeling diode in parallel with the load to handle this current:

+

+

Happy switching!


Previous post by Jason Sachs:
   Thermistor signal conditioning: Dos and Don'ts, Tips and Tricks
Next post by Jason Sachs:
   Complexity in Consumer Electronics Considered Harmful

+ + +
+ + + + +
+

+

Comments:

+
+ + +
+
[ - ]
Comment by CrossJuly 11, 2013
+
+
+
You have answered all my questions/concerns in a well written article. Thank you so much ! +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by vinodkaruvatMarch 4, 2014
+
+
+
hello sir,
I am using the IRF9321 P channel MOSFET for controlling my BLDC motor. The MOSFET is driven via a transistor which in turn is run by a freescale controller(3.3V pin). Now, when turning it on, it works fine. But, when turning it off its a disaster with the MOSFET taking almost 5ms to come to '0' Volts. I have been through the datasheet and it says turn off delay time is 180nSecs (approx .1uSecs).

Am I missing something? Also Sir, i have got no load.Its just to observe if the voltage comes out fine or not> I intend to connect a BLDC Motor to it. Will a load connected make it work better.

vinod +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by Daniel90June 9, 2014
+
+
+
Hi Jason,

I am a student. Can you explain what " more than a voltage drop " means in this paragraph : "The voltage between drain and source on an N-channel MOSFET must be positive, otherwise a parasitic body diode between drain and source conducts to keep the drain from being more than a voltage drop below the source."

With other words, how would you say that?

Sorry for my english. +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by jms_nhJune 9, 2014
+
+
+
Ah -- you found a typo. That should be "more than a diode drop". In other words if the drain is more than about 0.7-0.8V below the source, the diode will conduct and keep it from going any more negative. +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by ccpJanuary 28, 2016
+
+
+
Thank you for a very well written article, I learnt a lot. The only question I have now is:
For the topology #1 (high-side N-channel MOSFET), I understand that the Source must be connected to the power supply, and the Drain to the load, so in that case the Source has a higher voltage than the Drain. If the body diode has a forward voltage threshold of 2 volts and you have a power supply of 20 volts, how do you switch off the MOSFET? Doesn't the current continue flowing through the diode? +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by visitor79March 2, 2016
+
+
+
Actually, you’ve got it backwards. In topology #1 the drain is connected to the power supply and the source is connected to the load. +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by benk85April 30, 2016
+
+
+
Low-side N-channel is usually the winner for some loads ( as per the article). However, if ground WAS important, then it seems that P-ch high side would be the better option, yes? I wish to use a MOSFET to turn on/off ( provide power) to an ADC and amplifier. The FET would be controlled by a GPIO of a microcontroller -- everything running from a 3.3VDC source.

I am assuming that a P-ch high side configuration would be the better bet, yes?

Thanks for any insight.
+
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by jms_nhApril 30, 2016
+
+
+
You need a high-side MOSFET if it has to be grounded. P-channel high-side is simpler, and for low power stuff you're probably fine with a P-channel. (for high-power loads, where you need more silicon to carry the current, N-channel is cheaper, but you need a high-side gate driver) +
+
+ +
+
+
+
[ - ]
Comment by jms_nhApril 30, 2016
+
+
+
FDV302P and FDV304P are good cheap P-channel MOSFETs for low-power loads. Both are spec'd at 2.7V Vgs. +
+
+ +
+
+
+

To post reply to a comment, click on the 'reply' button attached to each comment. To post a new comment (not a reply to a comment) check out the 'Write a Comment' tab at the top of the comments.

+
+ +
+

Registering will allow you to participate to the forums on ALL the related sites and give you access to all pdf downloads.

+
+ Sign up +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
I agree with the terms of use and privacy policy.

+ Subscribe to occasional newsletter. VERY easy to unsubscribe.
+ + + + +
+ + +
+
+
+
+ or Sign in +
+ + + + + + + +
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+ +
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/resources/irlr8743pbf.pdf b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/resources/irlr8743pbf.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c058f4e Binary files /dev/null and b/Harbor_Freight_Bauer_drill_1791c-b1/resources/irlr8743pbf.pdf differ